2006 Consumer Confidence Report & Annual Water Supply Statement

Your water supply
Statement & statistics
Water quality
Water sources

Source Water Assessment
Sources and treatment
Frequently asked questions
Cryptosporidium and Giardia
Conservation

Important phone numbers
Detected contaminants
Contaminants not detected
Distribution system map
Terms & abbreviations
Supplemental reports
East Side Springs

Sky Ridge

Took's Spring

Detected contaminants

The frequency that various contaminants are tested for is regulated by the State and can vary from source to source. The State allows for some contaminants to be tested for less than once a year because the concentrations of these contaminants do not change frequently. Some of our data, though representative, is more than one year old. Some contaminants are monitored at the various sources more often than required.

Copper and lead in distribution system

Copper

Likely source of contamination: Corrosion of household plumbing systems, erosion of natural deposits, leaching from wood preservatives
Violation yes/no Sampling date(s) Average level found
(range)
90th percentile value Units MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Jun 05 0.09
(.002 -0.65)
0.18 mg/L 0 AL=1.3*
*AL (Action Level)—Only 10% of samples may exceed this level.

Lead

Likely source of contamination: Corrosion of household plumbing systems, erosion of natural deposits
Violation yes/no Sampling date(s) Average level found
(range)
90th percentile value Units MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Jun 05 1.8
(ND-20)
4.3 µg/L 0 AL=15*
*AL (Action Level)—Only 10% of samples may exceed this level.

*About lead and copper: In order to deter the leaching of lead and/or copper from our customers' pipes, OCWA has been mandated to implement corrosion control. Lead and copper sampling is required every 3 years.

The method of corrosion control used on waters originating from Otisco and Skaneateles lakes is the addition of orthophosphate. The adjustment of pH is the method used for Ontario water. OCWA's latest sampling period was in June of 2005 when OCWA sampled and tested the customers' taps to make sure the corrosion controls were effective.

90th percentile values for lead and copper: The values reported for lead and copper represent the 90th percentile. The 90th percentile value is the concentration that 90% of the taps sampled were at or below. Since the Action Level for Lead is 15 µg/L, 90% of the taps tested had to be at or below this value. As you can see from the above chart, 90% of the taps tested were at or below 4.3 µg/L in June of 2005. The Action Level for Copper is 1.3 mg/L. The observed 90th percentile for Copper was 0.18 mg/L. Of the 117 samples that OCWA tested in June of 2005, only 2 (or 1.7%) exceeded the action level for lead. No samples exceeded the action level for copper.

The testing showed that our methods of corrosion control are working.

Turbidity


Likely source of contamination: Soil runoff

Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Sampling frequency (date of highest reading) Average level found
(range)
Units MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL) Lowest % of monthly tests meeting limit
No Every 4 hr
(Aug 06)
0.07
(.03-.24)
NTU NA TT=0.3 NTU for systems that filter 100%

Lake Ontario
No Every 4 hr
(Nov 06)
0.05
(.04-.08)
NTU NA TT=0.3 NTU for systems that filter 100%

Skaneateles Lake
Yes* Every 4 hr
(Jan 06)
0.61
(.28-6.88)
NTU NA TT=5.0 NTU for systems that don't filter NA

About turbidity

Customers OCWA get their water from one of three sources. Water may originate from Otisco Lake, which is treated by OCWA itself, Lake Ontario which is treated by the Metropolitan Water Board (MWB) and wholesaled to OCWA, or Skaneateles Lake which is treated by the Syracuse Water Department and also sold to OCWA. Customers may also get a mixture of these waters.

Water purveyors are required to measure turbidity as water leaves their plants. Turbidity is a measure of the cloudiness of water. We monitor it because it is a good indicator of water quality. High turbidity can hinder the effectiveness of disinfectants. Treatment plants that filter also measure it because it is a good indicator of filter efficiency. Otisco Lake and Lake Ontario waters are filtered. Skaneateles Lake water is not.

*Treatment technique violation for turbidity (City of Syracuse)

On Jun 18-19, 2006 because of heavy rainfall and high winds, the turbidity levels entering the City of Syracuse's intake exceeded the maximum allowable standard of 5 turbidity units. OCWA customers were not affected by this high turbidity water. This is because OCWA maintains equipment that continuously monitors the turbidity of Skaneateles Lake water purchased at our connection in the Westhill Water District. This connection is shut down when turbidity approaches 5 NTU. Other OCWA customers who receive Skaneateles Water would not have been affected by this event.

Health effects of turbidity

Turbidity has no health effects. However, turbidity can interfere with disinfection and provide a medium for microbial growth. Turbidity may indicate the presence of disease-causing organisms. These organisms include bacteria, viruses, and parasites, which can cause symptoms such as nausea, cramps, diarrhea, and associated headaches. Please pay special attention to the additional statements in this report regarding Cryptosporidium.

Bacteria in distribution system


Likely source of contamination: Naturally present in the environment

Total coliform bacteria
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Month with highest % positive samples Units MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Approx 73 per week Dec
0.67%
(2 of 298)
NA 0 >5% positive samples in any month
Sample from OCWA distribution system

Whenever a positive sample for total coliform is found, the sample is further tested for the presence of E. coli, and four check samples are taken.

No samples were found to be E. coli positive in 2006. OCWA regularly samples about 73 sites per week located throughout our distribution system. We test these sites for both bacteria and disinfectant residual to ensure that our water is of a safe and sanitary quality.

Disinfectant & disinfection by-products in distribution system

Disinfection by-products: During disinfection, certain by-products form as a result of chlorine reacting with naturally occurring organic matter. The disinfection process is carefully monitored so that disinfection is effective, while levels of disinfection by-products are kept low. Trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) are classes of chemicals that OCWA is required to monitor in its distribution system.

Chlorine residual

Likely source of contamination: Added to water to kill harmful bacteria and to prevent the regrowth of bacteria.
OCWA distribution system
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Approx 73/week 0.57
(ND - 3.4)
mg/L NA 4 (MRDL)

Chlorite

Likely source of contamination: By-product of drinking water disinfection at plants using chlorine dioxide
OCWA distribution system
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Jan, Feb, Aug, Sep 0.37
(0.14-0.49)
mg/L NA 1

Total trihalomethanes

Likely source of contamination: By-product of drinking water chlorination. TTHMs form when source water contains large amounts of organic matter.
Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Quarterly: Feb, May, Aug, Nov 51
(33-71)
µg/L NA 80

Lake Ontario
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Quarterly: Feb, May, Aug, Nov 50
(32- 98)
µg/L NA 80

Skaneateles Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Quarterly: Feb, May, Aug, Nov 30.5
(20-41)
µg/L NA 80

Total trihalomethanes are the combined concentration of the following four contaminants: bromodichloromethane, bromoform, chloroform, and dibromochloromethane.

Haloacetic acids

Likely source of contamination: By-product of drinking water chlorination.
Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Quarterly: Feb, May, Aug, Nov 25
(6.1-47)
µg/L NA 60

Lake Ontario
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Quarterly: Feb, May, Aug, Nov 33
(20-65)
µg/L NA 60

Skaneateles Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Quarterly: Feb, May, Aug, Nov 19.5
(16-27)
µg/L NA 60

Haloacetic acids are the combined concentration of the following five contaminants: dibromo-, dichloro-, monobromo-, monochloro-, and trichloro-, acetic acids.

Inorganic contaminants found at entry point

Aluminum

Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits; residual aluminum may be from a chemical used in the treatment process.
Lake Ontario
No Jul 05 0.06 mg/L NA NA

Arsenic

Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits; runoff from orchards; runoff from glass and electronics production wastes
Lake Ontario
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Jul 06 1.1 µg/L NA 10

Barium

Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits
Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Feb 06
Dec 06
0.031
(.031-.031)
mg/L 2 2

Skaneateles Lake
No May 06 0.023 mg/L 2 2

Calcium

Likely source of contamination: Naturally occurring
Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Feb 06 42 mg/L NA NA

Lake Ontario
No Jul 06 31 mg/L NA NA

Chloride

Likely source of contamination: Naturally occurring, road salts
Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Feb 06
Dec 06
36
(36-39)
mg/L NA 250

Lake Ontario
No Jul 06 27 mg/L NA 250

Skaneateles Lake
No May 06 16 mg/L NA 250

Chlorite and chlorine dioxide residual
Chlorite and chlorine dioxide residual were tested-for daily for 103 days in 2006. Chlorine dioxide was added in the cold-water months of January and February and in the warm-water months of July, August, September, and October. During these 103 days, OCWA was adding chlorine dioxide as a preoxidant on a trial basis to see if it could control zebra mussels at the intake, provide adequate disinfection, and control the formation of undesirable disinfection by-products such as trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids.
 
Chlorite:
Likely source of contamination: By-product of drinking water disinfection at plants using chlorine dioxide
Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Daily 0.47
(ND-0.63)
mg/L NA 1

Chlorine dioxide residual:
Likely source of contamination: By-product of drinking water disinfection at plants using chlorine dioxide

Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Daily 20
(ND- 550)
µg/L NA 800 (MRDL)

Chromium

Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits
Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Feb 06
Dec 06
2.2
(ND-3.8)
µg/L 100 100

Copper

Likely source of contamination: Corrosion of household plumbing systems, erosion of natural deposits, leaching from wood preservatives
Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Feb 06
Dec 06
0.0009
(ND-0.0013)
mg/L NA AL=1.3

Lake Ontario
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Jul 06 0.018 mg/L NA AL=1.3

Fluoride

Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits, water additive that promotes strong teeth, discharge from fertilizer
Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Daily 0.96
(.04-1.18)
mg/L NA 2.2

Lake Ontario
No Twice daily 1.04
(.89-1.24)
mg/L NA 2.2

Skaneateles Lake
No Twice daily 0.97
(.22-1.36)
mg/L NA 2.2

Free chlorine residual

Likely source of contamination: Added to water to kill harmful bacteria and to prevent the regrowth of bacteria
Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Every 4 hr 0.98
(0.6 -1.35)
mg/L NA 4 (MRDL)

Lake Ontario
No Every hr 0.95
(0.75-0.99)
mg/L NA 4 (MRDL)

Skaneateles Lake
No Daily 1.36
(0.60- 2.2)
mg/L NA 4 (MRDL)

Magnesium

Likely source of contamination: Naturally occurring
Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Feb 06 11 mg/L NA NA

Nickel

Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits
Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Feb 06
Dec 06
1.5
(1.4-1.6)
µg/L NA NA

Nitrate

Likely source of contamination: Runoff from fertilizer use, leaching from septic tanks, sewage, erosion of natural deposits
Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Feb 06
Dec 06
0.72
(0.57-0.87)
mg/L 10 10

Lake Ontario
No Jul 06 0.24 mg/L 10 10

Skaneateles Lake
No May 06 0.69 mg/L 10 10

Selenium

Likely source of contamination: Discharge from petroleum and mineral refineries, erosion of natural deposits, discharge from mines
Lake Ontario
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Jul 06 1.1 µg/L 50 50

Sodium

Likely source of contamination: Naturally occurring, road salts, water softeners, animal wastes
Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Feb 06
Dec 06
18
(18-18)
mg/L NA See health effects

Lake Ontario
No Jul 06 17 mg/L NA See health effects

Skaneateles Lake
No May 06 8.7 mg/L NA See health effects
Health effects of sodium: Sodium has no MCL, but water containing more than 20 mg/L of sodium should not be used for drinking by people on severely restricted sodium diets. Water containing more than 270 mg/L of sodium should not be used for drinking by people on moderately restricted diets.

Sulfate

Likely source of contamination: Naturally occurring
Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Feb 06
Dec 06
16
(15-17)
mg/L NA 250

Lake Ontario
No Jul 06 27 mg/L NA 250

Skaneateles Lake
No May 06 15 mg/L NA 250

Zinc

Likely source of contamination: Naturally occurring, mining wastes
Skaneateles Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No May 06 0.01 mg/L NA 5

Organic contaminants found at entry point

Di(2-ethyl hexyl)adipate
Likely source of contamination: Discharge from chemical factories
Skaneateles Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No May 06 3.5 µg/L 0 50

Dissolved organic carbon

Likely source of contamination: Naturally occurring
Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Monthly 2.2
(1.9-3.1)
mg/L NA NA

Total organic carbon

Likely source of contamination: Naturally occurring
Otisco Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found
(range)
Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Monthly 2.3
(2.1-2.4)
mg/L NA NA

Lake Ontario
No Mar, May, Aug, Nov 1.9
(1.6-2.1)
mg/L NA NA

Radionuclides

Alpha emitters

Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits
Skaneateles Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No 2002 0.2 pCi/L 0 15

Strontium 90

Likely source of contamination: Waste from nuclear reactors, reactor parts and fluids, atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons, used as tracer in medical & agricultural studies
Lake Ontario
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Nov 06 3.57 pCi/L NA 8

Skaneateles Lake
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No 2002 0.4 pCi/L NA 8

Tritium

Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits
Skaneateles Lake
No 2002 310 pCi/L NA 20,000

Uranium 238

Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits
Lake Ontario
Violation yes/no Date(s) of sampling Average level found Units measured MCLG Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
No Nov 06 0.1484 pCi/L NA 30

Beta/photon emitters

Likely source of contamination: Decay of natural deposits and man-made emissions
Skaneateles Lake
No 2002 0.2 pCi/L 0 50*
*New York State considers 50 pCi/L to be the level of concern for beta particles.


 
More information: or 315-455-7061
After hours & weekend emergency answering service 315-475-7601