|
2006 Consumer Confidence Report & Annual Water Supply Statement
Detected contaminants
The frequency that various contaminants are tested for
is regulated by the State and can vary from source to
source. The State allows for some contaminants to be
tested for less than once a year because the
concentrations of these contaminants do not change
frequently. Some of our data, though representative,
is more than one year old. Some contaminants are
monitored at the various sources more often than
required.
Copper
Likely source of contamination: Corrosion of household plumbing systems, erosion of natural deposits, leaching from wood preservatives
|
Violation yes/no
|
Sampling date(s)
|
Average level found (range)
|
90th percentile value
|
Units
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Jun 05
|
0.09 (.002 -0.65)
|
0.18
|
mg/L
|
0
|
AL=1.3*
|
|
*AL (Action Level)Only 10% of samples may exceed this level.
|
Lead
Likely source of contamination: Corrosion of household plumbing systems, erosion of natural deposits
|
Violation yes/no
|
Sampling date(s)
|
Average level found (range)
|
90th percentile value
|
Units
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Jun 05
|
1.8 (ND-20)
|
4.3
|
µg/L
|
0
|
AL=15*
|
|
*AL (Action Level)Only 10% of samples may exceed this level.
|
*About lead and copper:
In order to deter the leaching of lead and/or copper
from our customers' pipes, OCWA has been mandated to
implement corrosion control. Lead and copper sampling
is required every 3 years.
The method of corrosion control used on waters
originating from Otisco and Skaneateles lakes is the
addition of orthophosphate. The adjustment of pH is
the method used for Ontario water. OCWA's latest
sampling period was in June of 2005 when OCWA sampled
and tested the customers' taps to make sure the
corrosion controls were effective.
90th percentile values for lead and copper:
The values reported for lead and copper represent the
90th percentile. The 90th percentile value is the
concentration that 90% of the taps sampled were at or
below. Since the Action Level for Lead is 15 µg/L, 90%
of the taps tested had to be at or below this value.
As you can see from the above chart, 90% of the taps
tested were at or below 4.3 µg/L in June of 2005. The
Action Level for Copper is 1.3 mg/L. The observed 90th
percentile for Copper was 0.18 mg/L. Of the 117
samples that OCWA tested in June of 2005, only 2 (or
1.7%) exceeded the action level for lead. No samples
exceeded the action level for copper.
The testing showed that our methods of corrosion
control are working.
Likely source of contamination: Soil runoff
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Sampling frequency (date of highest reading)
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
Lowest % of monthly tests meeting limit
|
|
No
|
Every 4 hr (Aug 06)
|
0.07 (.03-.24)
|
NTU
|
NA
|
TT=0.3 NTU for systems that filter
|
100%
|
| Lake Ontario |
|
No
|
Every 4 hr (Nov 06)
|
0.05 (.04-.08)
|
NTU
|
NA
|
TT=0.3 NTU for systems that filter
|
100%
|
| Skaneateles Lake |
|
Yes*
|
Every 4 hr (Jan 06)
|
0.61 (.28-6.88)
|
NTU
|
NA
|
TT=5.0 NTU for systems that don't filter
|
NA
|
About turbidity
Customers OCWA get their water from one of three sources.
Water may originate from Otisco Lake, which is treated
by OCWA itself, Lake Ontario which is treated by the
Metropolitan Water Board (MWB) and wholesaled to
OCWA, or Skaneateles Lake which is treated by the
Syracuse Water Department and also sold to OCWA.
Customers may also get a mixture of these waters.
Water purveyors are required to measure
turbidity
as water leaves their plants. Turbidity is a measure
of the cloudiness of water. We monitor it because it
is a good indicator of water quality. High turbidity
can hinder the effectiveness of disinfectants.
Treatment plants that filter also measure it because
it is a good indicator of filter efficiency. Otisco
Lake and Lake Ontario waters are filtered.
Skaneateles Lake water is not.
*Treatment technique violation for turbidity (City of Syracuse)
On Jun 18-19, 2006 because of heavy rainfall and high winds,
the turbidity levels entering
the City of Syracuse's intake exceeded the maximum
allowable standard of 5 turbidity units.
OCWA customers were not affected by this high
turbidity water. This is because OCWA maintains
equipment that continuously monitors the turbidity of
Skaneateles Lake water purchased at our connection in
the Westhill Water District.
This connection is shut down when
turbidity approaches 5 NTU.
Other OCWA customers who receive Skaneateles Water
would not have been affected by this event.
Health effects of turbidity
Turbidity has no health effects. However, turbidity
can interfere with disinfection and provide a medium
for microbial growth. Turbidity may indicate the
presence of disease-causing organisms. These organisms
include bacteria, viruses, and parasites, which can
cause symptoms such as nausea, cramps, diarrhea, and
associated headaches. Please pay special attention to
the additional statements in this report regarding
Cryptosporidium.
Likely source of contamination: Naturally present in the environment
| Total coliform bacteria |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Month with highest % positive samples
|
Units
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Approx 73 per week
|
Dec 0.67% (2 of 298)
|
NA
|
0
|
>5% positive samples in any month
|
|
Sample from OCWA distribution system
|
Whenever a positive sample for total coliform is
found, the sample is further tested for the presence
of E. coli, and four check samples are taken.
No samples were found to be E. coli positive in 2006.
OCWA regularly samples about 73 sites per week located
throughout our distribution system. We test these
sites for both bacteria and disinfectant residual to
ensure that our water is of a safe and sanitary quality.
Disinfection by-products:
During disinfection, certain by-products form as a
result of chlorine reacting with naturally occurring
organic matter. The disinfection process is carefully
monitored so that disinfection is effective, while
levels of disinfection by-products are kept low.
Trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) are
classes of chemicals that OCWA is required to monitor
in its distribution system.
Chlorine residual
Likely source of contamination: Added to water to kill harmful bacteria and to prevent the regrowth of bacteria.
| OCWA distribution system |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Approx 73/week
|
0.57 (ND - 3.4)
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
4 (MRDL)
|
Chlorite
Likely source of contamination: By-product of drinking water disinfection at plants using chlorine dioxide
| OCWA distribution system |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Jan, Feb, Aug, Sep
|
0.37 (0.14-0.49)
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
1
|
Total trihalomethanes
Likely source of contamination: By-product of drinking water chlorination. TTHMs form when source water contains large amounts of organic matter.
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Quarterly: Feb, May, Aug, Nov
|
51 (33-71)
|
µg/L
|
NA
|
80
|
| Lake Ontario |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Quarterly: Feb, May, Aug, Nov
|
50 (32- 98)
|
µg/L
|
NA
|
80
|
| Skaneateles Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Quarterly: Feb, May, Aug, Nov
|
30.5 (20-41)
|
µg/L
|
NA
|
80
|
Total trihalomethanes are the combined concentration
of the following four contaminants:
bromodichloromethane, bromoform, chloroform, and
dibromochloromethane.
Haloacetic acids
Likely source of contamination: By-product of drinking water chlorination.
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Quarterly: Feb, May, Aug, Nov
|
25 (6.1-47)
|
µg/L
|
NA
|
60
|
| Lake Ontario |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Quarterly: Feb, May, Aug, Nov
|
33 (20-65)
|
µg/L
|
NA
|
60
|
| Skaneateles Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Quarterly: Feb, May, Aug, Nov
|
19.5 (16-27)
|
µg/L
|
NA
|
60
|
Haloacetic acids are the combined concentration of the
following five contaminants: dibromo-, dichloro-,
monobromo-, monochloro-, and trichloro-, acetic acids.
Aluminum
Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits; residual aluminum may be from a chemical used in the treatment process.
| Lake Ontario |
|
No
|
Jul 05
|
0.06
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
NA
|
Arsenic
Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits; runoff from orchards; runoff from glass and electronics production wastes
| Lake Ontario |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Jul 06
|
1.1
|
µg/L
|
NA
|
10
|
Barium
Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Feb 06 Dec 06
|
0.031 (.031-.031)
|
mg/L
|
2
|
2
|
| Skaneateles Lake |
|
No
|
May 06
|
0.023
|
mg/L
|
2
|
2
|
Calcium
Likely source of contamination: Naturally occurring
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Feb 06
|
42
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
NA
|
| Lake Ontario |
|
No
|
Jul 06
|
31
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
NA
|
Chloride
Likely source of contamination: Naturally occurring, road salts
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Feb 06 Dec 06
|
36 (36-39)
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
250
|
| Lake Ontario |
|
No
|
Jul 06
|
27
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
250
|
| Skaneateles Lake |
|
No
|
May 06
|
16
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
250
|
Chlorite and chlorine dioxide residual
Chlorite and chlorine dioxide residual were tested-for
daily for 103 days in 2006. Chlorine dioxide was
added in the cold-water months of January and February
and in the warm-water months of July, August,
September, and October. During these 103 days, OCWA
was adding chlorine dioxide as a preoxidant on a trial
basis to see if it could control zebra mussels at the
intake, provide adequate disinfection, and control the
formation of undesirable disinfection by-products such
as trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids.
Chlorite:
Likely source of contamination: By-product of drinking water disinfection at plants using chlorine dioxide
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Daily
|
0.47 (ND-0.63)
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
1
|
Chlorine dioxide residual:
Likely source of contamination: By-product of drinking water disinfection at plants using chlorine dioxide
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Daily
|
20 (ND- 550)
|
µg/L
|
NA
|
800 (MRDL)
|
Chromium
Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Feb 06 Dec 06
|
2.2 (ND-3.8)
|
µg/L
|
100
|
100
|
Copper
Likely source of contamination: Corrosion of household plumbing systems, erosion of natural deposits, leaching from wood preservatives
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Feb 06 Dec 06
|
0.0009 (ND-0.0013)
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
AL=1.3
|
| Lake Ontario |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Jul 06
|
0.018
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
AL=1.3
|
Fluoride
Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits, water additive that promotes strong teeth, discharge from fertilizer
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Daily
|
0.96 (.04-1.18)
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
2.2
|
| Lake Ontario |
|
No
|
Twice daily
|
1.04 (.89-1.24)
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
2.2
|
| Skaneateles Lake |
|
No
|
Twice daily
|
0.97 (.22-1.36)
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
2.2
|
Free chlorine residual
Likely source of contamination: Added to water to kill harmful bacteria and to prevent the regrowth of bacteria
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Every 4 hr
|
0.98 (0.6 -1.35)
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
4 (MRDL)
|
| Lake Ontario |
|
No
|
Every hr
|
0.95 (0.75-0.99)
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
4 (MRDL)
|
| Skaneateles Lake |
|
No
|
Daily
|
1.36 (0.60- 2.2)
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
4 (MRDL)
|
Magnesium
Likely source of contamination: Naturally occurring
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Feb 06
|
11
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
NA
|
Nickel
Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Feb 06 Dec 06
|
1.5 (1.4-1.6)
|
µg/L
|
NA
|
NA
|
Nitrate
Likely source of contamination: Runoff from fertilizer use, leaching from septic tanks, sewage, erosion of natural deposits
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Feb 06 Dec 06
|
0.72 (0.57-0.87)
|
mg/L
|
10
|
10
|
| Lake Ontario |
|
No
|
Jul 06
|
0.24
|
mg/L
|
10
|
10
|
| Skaneateles Lake |
|
No
|
May 06
|
0.69
|
mg/L
|
10
|
10
|
Selenium
Likely source of contamination: Discharge from petroleum and mineral refineries, erosion of natural deposits, discharge from mines
| Lake Ontario |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Jul 06
|
1.1
|
µg/L
|
50
|
50
|
Sodium
Likely source of contamination: Naturally occurring, road salts, water softeners, animal wastes
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Feb 06 Dec 06
|
18 (18-18)
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
See health effects
|
| Lake Ontario |
|
No
|
Jul 06
|
17
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
See health effects
|
| Skaneateles Lake |
|
No
|
May 06
|
8.7
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
See health effects
|
Health effects of sodium: Sodium has no MCL,
but water containing more than 20 mg/L of sodium
should not be used for drinking by people on severely
restricted sodium diets. Water containing more than
270 mg/L of sodium should not be used for drinking by
people on moderately restricted diets.
Sulfate
Likely source of contamination: Naturally occurring
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Feb 06 Dec 06
|
16 (15-17)
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
250
|
| Lake Ontario |
|
No
|
Jul 06
|
27
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
250
|
| Skaneateles Lake |
|
No
|
May 06
|
15
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
250
|
Zinc
Likely source of contamination: Naturally occurring, mining wastes
| Skaneateles Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
May 06
|
0.01
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
5
|
Di(2-ethyl hexyl)adipate
Likely source of contamination: Discharge from chemical factories
| Skaneateles Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
May 06
|
3.5
|
µg/L
|
0
|
50
|
Dissolved organic carbon
Likely source of contamination: Naturally occurring
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Monthly
|
2.2 (1.9-3.1)
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
NA
|
Total organic carbon
Likely source of contamination: Naturally occurring
| Otisco Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found (range)
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Monthly
|
2.3 (2.1-2.4)
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
NA
|
| Lake Ontario |
|
No
|
Mar, May, Aug, Nov
|
1.9 (1.6-2.1)
|
mg/L
|
NA
|
NA
|
Alpha emitters
Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits
| Skaneateles Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
2002
|
0.2
|
pCi/L
|
0
|
15
|
Strontium 90
Likely source of contamination: Waste from nuclear reactors, reactor parts and fluids, atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons, used as tracer in medical & agricultural studies
| Lake Ontario |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Nov 06
|
3.57
|
pCi/L
|
NA
|
8
|
| Skaneateles Lake |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
2002
|
0.4
|
pCi/L
|
NA
|
8
|
Tritium
Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits
| Skaneateles Lake |
|
No
|
2002
|
310
|
pCi/L
|
NA
|
20,000
|
Uranium 238
Likely source of contamination: Erosion of natural deposits
| Lake Ontario |
|
Violation yes/no
|
Date(s) of sampling
|
Average level found
|
Units measured
|
MCLG
|
Regulatory limit (MCL, TT, or AL)
|
|
No
|
Nov 06
|
0.1484
|
pCi/L
|
NA
|
30
|
Beta/photon emitters
Likely source of contamination: Decay of natural deposits and man-made emissions
| Skaneateles Lake |
|
No
|
2002
|
0.2
|
pCi/L
|
0
|
50*
|
|
*New York State considers 50 pCi/L to be the level of concern for beta particles.
|
More information: or 315-455-7061
After hours & weekend emergency answering service 315-475-7601
|
|
|
|